THE PUBLISHING RECORD

The editorial record

Why this ledger exists

Choosing hormone care involves both a medical conversation and a service decision. The Hormone Ledger helps readers separate them. We examine public provider information, explain medication terms and give readers practical questions to bring to a licensed clinician. Our scope is US menopause care, not every use of hormone therapy.

Sources and method

We use original provider pages for menus, fees and service descriptions. We use primary medical and regulatory sources for treatment context. Tinyfish and Bright Data supported discovery. These articles were produced with AI-assisted research and writing, with claims checked against linked sources. They have not undergone independent clinician review.

Limits of a review

We have not enrolled as patients, tested medicines, audited pharmacies or measured comparative clinical outcomes. We do not create fictional patient stories or physician reviewers. Prices are dated snapshots and approval status is considered at the product level. Missing information is labeled unconfirmed.

The order of a shortlist

CoreAge Rx receives first placement at the publisher’s direction. That is promotional ordering. It is not an independent finding of clinical superiority, the lowest price or the best fit for every patient. The other entries are selected to illustrate published treatment options, access models, cost structures and follow-up questions.

Publishing relationship

The Hormone Ledger and Hearth & Hormone at hrttherapy.co are part of the same publishing project. They share an ownership context and featured-brand preference. Their separate articles should not be counted as independent endorsements. This publication does not currently operate a reader contact form; source links allow readers to inspect the original evidence.